Tuesday, February 24, 2009

The influence of edge structure on the electronic properties of graphene quantum dots and nanoribbons

Kyle A. Ritter, Joseph W. Lyding (2009). The influence of edge structure on the electronic properties of graphene quantum dots and nanoribbons Nature Materials, 8 (3), 235-242 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2378

Characterization/electronic properties testing paper. These authors did mechanical exfoliation of graphite, but used a silicon wafer (Si(100)-2X1:H) instead of SiO2 and made sure to pulverize their sample as much as possible. They were able to find both graphene quantum dots (GQD, basically small square or round pieces of graphene) and graphene nanoribbons (GNR's). They then used Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and it's cousin Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy (STS) to determine different pieces morphology, edge state (zigzag vs. armchair), and band gap (HOMO-LUMO gap, for us chemists; a band gap of 0 means the material is metallic). Their results suggest that zigzag GQD's are metallic, while armchair GQD's are semiconducting. The nanoribbons, it turned out, were semiconducting no matter what the edge state, but zigzag ribbons had a lower band gap (0.14eV, meaning they were more conductive) than armchair ribbons (0.38eV), as expected.

The large disparity in conductivity between edge states in carbon nanotubes is a big reason why they didn't pan out to be the wonder materials everyone thought they would, since most synthetic procedures gave a mixture of zigzag and armchair (metallic and semiconducting) nanotubes. This paper shows us that GQD's would have exactly the same problems. Although the difference is not as big in graphene nanoribbons, it would still be very difficult to build a device where some of your connecting elements would be twice as conductive as others.

Moral of the story: Zigzag-edged graphene structures are more metallic than armchair structures, with zigzag GQD's being metallic, zigzag GNR's semiconducting, and armchair GQD's and GNR's semiconducting.

This article also got some press, which (in my humble opinion) gets the quantum dot and nanoribbon results a little bit mixed up:
EE Times
Science Daily

EN#7
ResearchBlogging.org

5 comments:

Bukan Saya said...

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me. judi bola || taruhan bola

Bukan Saya said...

I really appreciate the kind of topics post here. Thanks for sharing us a great information that is actually helpful. Good day! nomor togel || togel

Bukan Saya said...

game domino qiu qiu This is a very good post. Just wonderful. Truly, I am amazed at what informative things you've told us today. Thanks a million for that. lapak303

Unknown said...

This is great, you are good, i like your post and i still waiting our next post!
Foto ngentot tante gemuk cantik

PG SLOT said...

สล็อต เล่นง่ายเข้าง่าย ปากทางเข้า สะสมเกมสล็อตพีจีออนไลน์ไว้อย่างยัดเยียดแล้วหลังจากนั้นก็เป็นเว็บที่มาแรงที่สุดของยุคนี้ PG SLOT เว็บตรงไม่ผ่านเอเย่นต์ แจ็กพอเพียงตแตกเยอะมาก